Blog Feeds
02-08 06:10 PM
There's a great op-ed in the Washington Post by Kevin Huffman that highlights some of the antics of the former Congressman: In our moderate, land-locked state [Colorado], my Republican neighbors would sometimes express puzzlement over Tancredo�s obsession. He came to sound more like a deranged border-patrolling Minuteman than a Colorado congressman. On Thursday, Tancredo delivered the opening remarks at the national Tea Party convention, and, as I watched the clips, I was struck by two things. First, it was oddly gratifying to see Tancredo take the next step in a long personal journey toward Crazy Land. *** Here is Tancredo�s...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/antiimmigrant-tancredo-kicks-off-tea-party-convention.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/antiimmigrant-tancredo-kicks-off-tea-party-convention.html)
wallpaper This look is really cute for
Blog Feeds
03-04 08:10 AM
The concept of separation of powers, and of "checks and balances", is as old as Ancient Greece and the Roman Republic. Our Founding Fathers modeled the U.S. Constitution on principles derived from Enlightenment philosophers like Montesquieu who believed that "the judiciary was generally seen as the most important of powers, independent and unchecked..." He specified that "the independence of the judiciary has to be real, and not apparent merely." Unfortunately, in a stunning departure from such principles, under a law enacted in 1996, "discretionary" decisions of the USCIS and the BIA cannot be reviewed by the Federal Courts. And because...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/03/lack-of-checks-and-balances-in-removal-proceedings.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/03/lack-of-checks-and-balances-in-removal-proceedings.html)
ragz4u
02-05 04:47 PM
We are pleased to announce that renowned author and economist Dr. Richard Florida has endorsed the efforts of the folks at www.immigrationvoice.org
You can read the bio of Dr. Richard here http://www.creativeclass.org/_flight_author.shtml
The text of the endorsement can be seen here http://www.immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=49&Itemid=43
You can read the bio of Dr. Richard here http://www.creativeclass.org/_flight_author.shtml
The text of the endorsement can be seen here http://www.immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=49&Itemid=43
2011 tattoo VERY SHORT HAIRSTYLES
pani_6
08-03 10:09 PM
WHITE TIE MARCH..how does that sound...
Lets all follow dress code...White Ties, blue(Or DArk) COAT,Polished Shoes...and DARK GLASS(Representing Leagally Blind)...
Get Students to join by contacting ISA.. and giving them a Free ride to DC from near by places.
Dont Forget to Carry Us flags and God bless America banners!
Lets all follow dress code...White Ties, blue(Or DArk) COAT,Polished Shoes...and DARK GLASS(Representing Leagally Blind)...
Get Students to join by contacting ISA.. and giving them a Free ride to DC from near by places.
Dont Forget to Carry Us flags and God bless America banners!
more...
checklaw
06-05 12:02 PM
Is my birth certificate needed to invite my parents on visitor visa? Isn't my SSC certificate showing date of birth and both parents name enough?
Birth certifcate is a good document to prove the genuineness of the ties with people you claim to be your parents and whom you are trying to get here.
Its good to show it if you have it. If you are afraid of sending the Original send a US notarised copy.
The intention of the document is to only prove your ties with your parents.
If you do not have one or do not wish to furnish one, you can still try.
checklaw
Birth certifcate is a good document to prove the genuineness of the ties with people you claim to be your parents and whom you are trying to get here.
Its good to show it if you have it. If you are afraid of sending the Original send a US notarised copy.
The intention of the document is to only prove your ties with your parents.
If you do not have one or do not wish to furnish one, you can still try.
checklaw
rajesh212
03-26 01:22 PM
Company A filed my PERM in Sep 2008 showing 5 yrs job experience as of April 2005 .
I joined Company B citing 6 yrs job experience as of Dec 2009 due to various reasons.
Joined Company B in Dec 2009 and have H1b valid till April 2011 which is when my 6 year period ends.
My issues are:
1. If Company B files for my 7th year extension using the pending PERM, will the job experience discrepancy pose any problems ?
2. Does Company B have to know all the details in my pending PERM or just the case number to use it?
3. What is the earliest Company B can apply for 7th year extension?
Thank you very much for your help!!
I joined Company B citing 6 yrs job experience as of Dec 2009 due to various reasons.
Joined Company B in Dec 2009 and have H1b valid till April 2011 which is when my 6 year period ends.
My issues are:
1. If Company B files for my 7th year extension using the pending PERM, will the job experience discrepancy pose any problems ?
2. Does Company B have to know all the details in my pending PERM or just the case number to use it?
3. What is the earliest Company B can apply for 7th year extension?
Thank you very much for your help!!
more...
srarao
07-25 09:25 AM
Any Use for us
http://www.numbersusa.com/index
http://www.numbersusa.com/index
2010 wallpaper 2011 cute short bob
buehler
06-19 03:58 PM
There is no such deadline. But it would do you good to file them before July 31st or other wise it might retrogress.
more...
srox
03-03 08:59 PM
Hi all...
i'm Srox from malaysia...n this is myself , sketches in 10 minutes using wacom :)
http://img.skitch.com/20090304-8t1fcc56mnpjd31gwce7js27q2.jpg
Happy voting!
i'm Srox from malaysia...n this is myself , sketches in 10 minutes using wacom :)
http://img.skitch.com/20090304-8t1fcc56mnpjd31gwce7js27q2.jpg
Happy voting!
hair Long Hair Easy Long 10
jville
11-09 02:16 PM
it is safe to go with EB3 route. You can file another one in EB2 latter and port the date.
more...
das0
12-09 02:39 AM
can anyone pls help?
hot the cute short hairstyle
brick2006
11-30 12:03 PM
hello...
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
>> i cam here on F1-h1-now back to F1.... do i have to go to my country of origin to get my visa stamped.
inputs Pleaseeeee..
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
>> i cam here on F1-h1-now back to F1.... do i have to go to my country of origin to get my visa stamped.
inputs Pleaseeeee..
more...
house short blonde hairstyles.
ramus
01-27 09:42 AM
Please join our NC IV group and you will get all info from our NC members.
please reply!!!!
please reply!!!!
tattoo Cute short haircuts for women
MerciesOfInjustices
02-22 10:28 AM
People from Arizona please sign up here
Sorry, just noted this now on Feb 22nd!
But, I would be open for any meetings in the future!
Sorry, just noted this now on Feb 22nd!
But, I would be open for any meetings in the future!
more...
pictures This is a very easy hairstyle
pappu
04-13 11:27 AM
IV is planning to present a proposal for a funding opportunity. If you have an experience writing such proposals in the past, please contact us ASAP. Members in academic professions may be best suited for this help.
dresses house short haircuts cute
logiclife
04-04 11:52 AM
Isnt it early? Or is it announced?
more...
makeup Cute Short Hairstyles
dan19
03-16 04:09 PM
You cannot use the “AUTO VISA Revalidation” rule once you go for stamping.
Please share your experience of H1b visa stamping in Halifax or Quebec (Canada).
I am planning drive to Halifax or Quebec end of this month.
I am intended to use “AUTO VISA Revalidation” rule.
I am from India and I don’t have any U.S. degree.
Any suggestions.
Please share your experience of H1b visa stamping in Halifax or Quebec (Canada).
I am planning drive to Halifax or Quebec end of this month.
I am intended to use “AUTO VISA Revalidation” rule.
I am from India and I don’t have any U.S. degree.
Any suggestions.
girlfriend Cute Short Hairstyles
flresident
01-27 01:43 PM
Your school's International Student Advisor should be able to give you exact information.
hairstyles Cute short haircuts sexy
Robert Kumar
03-23 07:48 PM
Approved i-140
How many days is it taking these days for 140 to get approved.
How many days is it taking these days for 140 to get approved.
Macaca
07-22 05:39 PM
Empty Promises (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_8/editorial/19419-1.html), July 18, 2007
As Senate Democrats were preparing to go to the mattresses over Iraq voting procedures and as Republicans threatened to stop all activity over a judicial appointment, it's worth recalling what Senate leaders were promising at the outset of the 110th Congress.
On Jan. 4, incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared on the floor that "last November, the voters sent us a message - Democrats and Republicans. The voters are upset with Congress and the partisan gridlock. The voters want a government that focuses on their needs. The voters want change. Together, we must deliver that change."
Minutes later, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) observed that "the challenges ahead will not be met if we do nothing to overcome the partisanship that has come to characterize this body over the past several years. A culture of partisanship over principle represents a grave threat to the Senate's best tradition as a place of constructive cooperation. It undermines the spirit and the purpose of this institution. And we must do something to reverse its course."
Six months on, the Senate has devolved into a nonstop brawl. The House, where leaders made let's-work-together promises of their own, also is a cauldron of partisanship, but at least there the rules permit a majority to rule.
But together, they've been able to pass just three pieces of significant legislation - a hike in the minimum wage, expansion of stem-cell research funding and a supplemental appropriation to fund the Iraq War. Only the first was directly signed into law. The second was vetoed by President Bush. The third was vetoed then passed.
Partisan warfare and inaction on issues from health care to immigration to energy - even lobbying and ethics reform, once the top priority for this Congress - has reduced respect for the legislative branch to its lowest level ever. Respect for the presidency is not much higher.
Who's to blame? Senate Democrats accuse Senate Republicans of "obstructionism" - systematic refusal to grant unanimous consent so that bills can be voted upon. Senate Republicans blame Reid for invoking cloture to stifle full debate and the offering of amendments.
The level of rancor is escalating now because Democrats are frustrated that Republicans are insisting on a 60-vote threshold on Iraq War amendments - as though Democrats in the past have not used the 60-vote requirement when it suited them. Republicans are threatening to create procedural chaos and allow little or no action on the floor if Democrats block a single appellate court nominee.
In January, Senators of both parties gathered in the Old Senate Chamber in what McConnell described as "a small act of bipartisanship" that he hoped would lead to a restoration of the Senate's reputation. Now, perhaps, Senators should regather there and contemplate their current level of public esteem.
As Senate Democrats were preparing to go to the mattresses over Iraq voting procedures and as Republicans threatened to stop all activity over a judicial appointment, it's worth recalling what Senate leaders were promising at the outset of the 110th Congress.
On Jan. 4, incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared on the floor that "last November, the voters sent us a message - Democrats and Republicans. The voters are upset with Congress and the partisan gridlock. The voters want a government that focuses on their needs. The voters want change. Together, we must deliver that change."
Minutes later, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) observed that "the challenges ahead will not be met if we do nothing to overcome the partisanship that has come to characterize this body over the past several years. A culture of partisanship over principle represents a grave threat to the Senate's best tradition as a place of constructive cooperation. It undermines the spirit and the purpose of this institution. And we must do something to reverse its course."
Six months on, the Senate has devolved into a nonstop brawl. The House, where leaders made let's-work-together promises of their own, also is a cauldron of partisanship, but at least there the rules permit a majority to rule.
But together, they've been able to pass just three pieces of significant legislation - a hike in the minimum wage, expansion of stem-cell research funding and a supplemental appropriation to fund the Iraq War. Only the first was directly signed into law. The second was vetoed by President Bush. The third was vetoed then passed.
Partisan warfare and inaction on issues from health care to immigration to energy - even lobbying and ethics reform, once the top priority for this Congress - has reduced respect for the legislative branch to its lowest level ever. Respect for the presidency is not much higher.
Who's to blame? Senate Democrats accuse Senate Republicans of "obstructionism" - systematic refusal to grant unanimous consent so that bills can be voted upon. Senate Republicans blame Reid for invoking cloture to stifle full debate and the offering of amendments.
The level of rancor is escalating now because Democrats are frustrated that Republicans are insisting on a 60-vote threshold on Iraq War amendments - as though Democrats in the past have not used the 60-vote requirement when it suited them. Republicans are threatening to create procedural chaos and allow little or no action on the floor if Democrats block a single appellate court nominee.
In January, Senators of both parties gathered in the Old Senate Chamber in what McConnell described as "a small act of bipartisanship" that he hoped would lead to a restoration of the Senate's reputation. Now, perhaps, Senators should regather there and contemplate their current level of public esteem.
pcs
01-06 08:40 AM
You can port PD even to a new employer. Pl. read other threads which have more info ?
By the way, during these two off days please tell every friend of yours about IV .............
Thanks
By the way, during these two off days please tell every friend of yours about IV .............
Thanks
