zico123
06-22 06:21 PM
Both my daughter and I have her old I-94 number on our new I-94s. They did not put my old I-94 number on my new I-94.
Your new I-94 should have your your old I-94 number. Same applies to your daughter. Her new i94 should have same number as her old i94.
Your new I-94 should have your your old I-94 number. Same applies to your daughter. Her new i94 should have same number as her old i94.
wallpaper america ferrera weight
lotsofspace
01-09 04:29 PM
bump
lj_rr
07-01 03:57 PM
This should be "Department of Homeland Security" per Attorney.
for 482 the 2 checks of 325 and 70 and one check of 180$ for I765 should be payble to 'Department of Homeland Security', or 'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service'
The form says it should be payble to 'Department of Homeland Security' and the immigration voice 485 help thread says it should be payble to 'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service' .
Please suggest and sorry if this si a repost. I could not find a exact answer.
Thanks
-M:confused:
for 482 the 2 checks of 325 and 70 and one check of 180$ for I765 should be payble to 'Department of Homeland Security', or 'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service'
The form says it should be payble to 'Department of Homeland Security' and the immigration voice 485 help thread says it should be payble to 'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service' .
Please suggest and sorry if this si a repost. I could not find a exact answer.
Thanks
-M:confused:
2011 America Ferrera wins our quot;Okay
factoryman
06-21 05:43 PM
My thinking was : I think it is small (citation and fine); so, you can ignore it.
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
more...
JazzByTheBay
09-11 10:39 PM
http://morejazzbythebay.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/sanjoserallybnr4-2.jpg
SAN JOSE WAS THE BEGINNING, DC WILL BE A HUGE MILESTONE!
(San Jose rally pictures and videos, and Aman's messages from Milpitas, CA meeting can be found at http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com (http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com/))
http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/20/99/22609920.jpg
cheers, and see ya'll in DC!
jazz
SAN JOSE WAS THE BEGINNING, DC WILL BE A HUGE MILESTONE!
(San Jose rally pictures and videos, and Aman's messages from Milpitas, CA meeting can be found at http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com (http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com/))
http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/20/99/22609920.jpg
cheers, and see ya'll in DC!
jazz
Blog Feeds
09-18 10:20 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
more...
dollyGC
07-21 08:10 PM
I'm working with an MNC and I'm abt to start my GC processing.I did go through the forum on threads on Fragomen.My employer's preferred attorney is Fragomen.
How good are they ?Else if not is there any other way I could avoid getting the GC processed by them?
How good are they ?Else if not is there any other way I could avoid getting the GC processed by them?
2010 Free Picture: America Ferrera
srikanth003
02-28 10:47 AM
Thanks for your time and consideration. I was of the same opinion till now. But getting a little flustered lately, since my I-94 end date is 10-Jun-2011. I could not check back with my employer if they would be doing a premium one. Because once I raise any such queries, they might start the process now itself to avoid last minute submissions. Since there would be questions from them on why did I delay till now etc :(
Thats the fix I am in now.
Thats the fix I am in now.
more...
perm2gc
09-07 05:00 PM
I meant before I am out of status.
Also, if there are no paystubs for that period, are there any implications in regards to GC processing or any other way ?
Thanks a bunch.
OzIn Some Cases USCIS may ask paystubs before approving the H1(So be careful with company A..you need them until you get the approval notice). In case of GC, couple of months will not effect the process.
Also, if there are no paystubs for that period, are there any implications in regards to GC processing or any other way ?
Thanks a bunch.
OzIn Some Cases USCIS may ask paystubs before approving the H1(So be careful with company A..you need them until you get the approval notice). In case of GC, couple of months will not effect the process.
hair Good to see America Ferrera
whattodo21
04-29 11:44 AM
You can apply for an MTR, and if it is approved, you are safe. If not, you will be out of status from the day your petition was denied.
You can apply for H1 with another employer and have it premium processed.
Share your rfe with us, to know more of the reason...
You can apply for H1 with another employer and have it premium processed.
Share your rfe with us, to know more of the reason...
more...
d123
08-07 04:22 PM
My case got LUD 8/5 , I filed my I-485 on 2nd july... She spoke to me nicely and told me that there is no update or no entry of my case... Wait for few weeks..... TSC.........wait....... TSC...
hot America Ferrera.
indianabacklog
02-13 03:11 PM
I recently started work with a new employer using my EAD. I have a pending RFE on my 485 which I have to respond to in a couple of weeks. However, today I noticed that my 485 got a soft LUD of the day following the day I started with my new employer. My new employer uses eVerify but I didnt expect that it could be linked with a pending 485. Maybe I am wrong but I see no reason for the USCIS to touch my 485 until I have responded to the RFE.
Has anyone else noticed something similar when you started with a new employer using eVerify?
E Verify is a system operated by the social security administration, not the Department of Homeland Security. Cannot imagine your LUD and E verify can be remotely related. Just a coincidence. Relax enjoy your new job and let the I 485 process roll along as it will.
Has anyone else noticed something similar when you started with a new employer using eVerify?
E Verify is a system operated by the social security administration, not the Department of Homeland Security. Cannot imagine your LUD and E verify can be remotely related. Just a coincidence. Relax enjoy your new job and let the I 485 process roll along as it will.
more...
house America Ferrera and the rest
gc2
10-04 10:58 AM
hi, i recently filed 485,EAD,AP for my wife and the attorney asked for check of $1010/- that includes unlimited EAD renewals.
Is this really possible ? Please advise.
Is this really possible ? Please advise.
tattoo Suarez (America Ferrera)
pbojja
04-15 02:52 PM
Thanks Vamshi , No worries just curious .
I rather most of us achived what ever we achevied in hard way , so I know from the begining I will get GC in the hard way .
I rather most of us achived what ever we achevied in hard way , so I know from the begining I will get GC in the hard way .
more...
pictures The America Ferrera we all met
akkakarla
08-22 08:22 PM
Actions speak louder than words. If they are deeply concerned then they should be taking steps forward to make something happen.
dresses Meister/America Ferrera
gc_user
11-27 09:29 PM
My husband has a unique experience with his I 485.My husband's employer filed I 131 ,I 485 for my husband and I 131,I 485 and I 765 for me on august 16.I recieved my receipts on october 16 and got my EAD approved on November 16. My husband didn't receive even receipt notices.
When he called UCSIS and checked on his status with level 2 officer, they told that they did not have any info on I485 but voided his I 131 application. He is planning on reapplying for I485.
Is there any downside of reapplying it as our priority date is september 2003(EB2).
When he called UCSIS and checked on his status with level 2 officer, they told that they did not have any info on I485 but voided his I 131 application. He is planning on reapplying for I485.
Is there any downside of reapplying it as our priority date is september 2003(EB2).
more...
makeup Actress America Ferrera lists
waitin_toolong
07-18 07:25 PM
you are correct .
You can file AOS for her mention both her current H4 status and also inxclude a copy of H1 notice just in case
You can file AOS for her mention both her current H4 status and also inxclude a copy of H1 notice just in case
girlfriend America Ferrera sizzles in
vkallank
09-21 09:06 PM
guyfrommsg,
i have filed in the form / submitted the application for joining the google GA group. please check.
i have filed in the form / submitted the application for joining the google GA group. please check.
hairstyles novice America Ferrera
harsh
12-30 10:39 PM
I read somewhere that the new memo is effective immediately. So you should consult with your immigration attorney soon. You might be able to take advantage of the new memo and get 6 years of H1b.
Dhundhun
03-27 07:35 PM
:)LOL:)
Wait for GC is a lifestyle.
Wait for GC is a lifestyle.
itsokgc
07-18 01:17 PM
Hi guys,
I have the following clarification:
Earlier, I was working with Employer A and came to US after getting H1-B stamped.
Subsequently, my spouse has got her H4 visa stamped.
So, both of our visas are valid till 30th Sept 2007. My wife joined me in December 2005.
Then I changed my employer in April 2006, where I got my I-129 approved from Employer B.
In the meantime, my wife/spouse went to India in April 2006 & came back to US using old visa on July 15th 2006.
At port of Entry she got I-94 valid till 30th Sept 2007 (validity date of the old visa A)
I never got her I-94/H4 using the new I-129 from Employer B (Current Employer).
On July 3rd, I submitted my I-485 AOS for both of us.
I have the following question:
1. Is her I-94 still valid based on the old visa ?
2. Will there be any issues for not filing for H4 visa till now, even though I am planning to
apply right away as her I-94 is getting expired on 30th Sept 2007.
3. Is she out of Status as I left the old employer more than 180 days ago.
4. Will she have any issues as far as AOS is concerned.
Your valuable views will be highly appreciated.
I have the following clarification:
Earlier, I was working with Employer A and came to US after getting H1-B stamped.
Subsequently, my spouse has got her H4 visa stamped.
So, both of our visas are valid till 30th Sept 2007. My wife joined me in December 2005.
Then I changed my employer in April 2006, where I got my I-129 approved from Employer B.
In the meantime, my wife/spouse went to India in April 2006 & came back to US using old visa on July 15th 2006.
At port of Entry she got I-94 valid till 30th Sept 2007 (validity date of the old visa A)
I never got her I-94/H4 using the new I-129 from Employer B (Current Employer).
On July 3rd, I submitted my I-485 AOS for both of us.
I have the following question:
1. Is her I-94 still valid based on the old visa ?
2. Will there be any issues for not filing for H4 visa till now, even though I am planning to
apply right away as her I-94 is getting expired on 30th Sept 2007.
3. Is she out of Status as I left the old employer more than 180 days ago.
4. Will she have any issues as far as AOS is concerned.
Your valuable views will be highly appreciated.
